Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs OPPO Find X6 Pro vs Honor Magic 5 Pro are all now available for purchase. They were all released this 2023 and across boards are some identical features. However, in this post, we’re going to compare the specs of those three flagship smartphones to find out which one is the best.

Starting with their prices, the OPPO Find X6 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra have a starting price of $1,199 for the 12GB RAM and 256GB storage models. While the Honor Magic 5 Pro is the cheapest with a starting price of $999 for the 8/256 GB storage model.

Pricing Verdict: The Honor Magic 5 Pro is more affordable, while the Find X6 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra are more expensive.

Pricing and Where to Buy

Magic 5 Pro	Price
Buy on Giztop	$999.00

Xiaomi 13 Ultra	Price	Coupon
Buy on Giztop	$1,199.00	13U30

OPPO Find X6 Pro	Price	Save
Buy on Giztop	$1,099.00	$100.00

Display | Durability

OPPO Find X6 Pro brings a 6.82-inch LTPO3 OLED screen with 1440 x 3168px resolution and a 1-120Hz refresh rate. The Honor Magic 5 Pro boasts a 6.81-inch LTPO OLED 120Hz screen with a 1312 x 2848px resolution.

Xiaomi 13 Ultra gets a smaller 6.73-inch LTPO3 OLED screen with 1440 x 3200px resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. All three phones bring under-display fingerprint scanners, and IP68 water resistance but the Xiaomi 13 Ultra has the brightest panel.

Display verdict: The Xiaomi 13 Ultra has the best display, followed by the OPPO Find X6 Pro and the last position is the Honor Magic 5 Pro.

See Also: Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: which is the better ULTRA Phone

Camera- Photos & Video

Xiaomi 13 Ultra has four 50MP sensors on the back – 50MP 1-inch main Sensor + 50MP Ultrawide + 50MP telephoto + 50MP periscope lens. OPPO Find X6 Pro has the same 50MP 1-inch main sensor + 50MP Ultrawide + 50MP periscope lens. The Honor Magic 5 Pro brings a 50MP sensor on its main cam + 50MP ultrawide module + 50MP periscope telephoto camera.

They all possess a 50MP main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), however, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra takes the gold medal. It is more versatile, has a wider FOV for the Ultrawide lens, and has better zoom capabilities. Moreover, it records video at 8k@24fps. Unlike the others capped at 4K resolution. There are a lot of things you can do in photography and videography with the help of the Xiaomi 13 Ultra.

Camera Verdict: Xiaomi 13 Ultra takes the gold medal, while the runner-up is between the OPPO Find X6 and Honor Magic 5 Pro.

Performance | Software | Memory Configuration

Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs OPPO Find X6 Pro vs Honor Magic 5 Pro- all three flagship smartphones come with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.0 storage. The new phones are also launching with Android 13 software out of the box. Below are the memory configurations.

Xiaomi 13 Ultra brings 12/16 GB RAM + 256 GB – 1TB storage configuration. While OPPO Find X6 Pro has 12/16 GB RAM + 256/512 GB storage options. And lastly, the Honor Magic 5 Pro has 8/12/16 GB RAM options + 256/512 GB storage.

Verdict: The performance across boards is similar, however, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is the only one that can be configured with up to 1TB of storage.

Battery | Charging Technology

Honor Magic 5 Pro packs a larger 5,4000 mAh battery with 66W wired and 50W wireless fast charging. OPPO Find X6 Pro brings a 5,000 mAh cell with 100W wired and 50W wireless fast charging, while Xiaomi 13 Ultra gets a 5,000 mAh cell and supports a 90W wired and 50W wireless charging solution.

Battery Verdict: Honor Magic 5 Pro has the biggest battery cell but with a slower charging solution. OPPO Find X6 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra have decent battery sizes with faster charging technology.

See Also: OPPO Find X6 Pro vs vivo X90 Pro Plus: Which is better

Conclusion: Xiaomi 13 Ultra vs OPPO Find X6 Pro vs Honor Magic 5 Pro

Xiaomi 13 Ultra is better than the OPPO Find X6 Pro and Honor Magic 5 Pro. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is more advantageous when it comes to camera- photography & videography alike. Additionally, the display is sharper and currently the brightest in the tech industry.